Taking a Deposition via Skype is Properly Acceptable

video conference callA deposition is a necessary process in any lawsuit. This is especially true for medical malpractice, technical lawsuits, asbestos litigation, construction defect, and engineering cases. It can also take up a lot of time when the person who will issue a deposition is from out of town.

Court reporters from Phoenix and other areas are familiar with this problem. In which case, the use of video conferencing and Skype is a big help in taking depositions from people who are not around.

Video Conferencing or Skype Deposition

Depositions via video conferencing are an acceptable form of providing the court with information relevant to a case. This is an extension of the phone depositions. A person can participate in a deposition according to prevailing courts of law.

The participant has been served a subpoena prior to the deposition. The participant is also expected to make all arrangements to participate, and each party must pay for their own expenses for the deposition. Considering that Skype is an acceptable medium for a deposition, there is usually no cost to giving a deposition.

Element of Time

The courts are always striving to try lawsuits as soon as possible, as much as they want to finish the cases as quickly as possible. That doesn’t mean the case can be handled haphazardly and without adequate information for both sides. It only means that if there are ways for the parties to swiftly provide testimony, then those options would be taken.

Telephone depositions have been in use for a long time. As a medium of communication, Skype and video conferencing have the same advantages as a telephone. In addition, video conferencing and Skype have the capability to transfer files as needed.

With remote depositions via Skype, court reporters can easily transcribe the depositions. In the same manner, the depositions can also be checked while communicating via Skype or with video conferencing. This is a very 21st-century technology that is accepted for use by the courts. Better technologies are expected to come along, and the courts would most probably allow their use in the future.